Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):568–577. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0178

Table 3.

Change in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcomes by Treatment Group and Stratified by Agea

Outcome Age, y Change (SE) Difference in change (95% CI) P value for interaction
Intensive treatment Standard treatment
Hippocampal volume, cm3 <75 −0.04 (0.01) −0.02 (0.01) −0.021 (−0.053 to 0.011) .18
≥75 −0.12 (0.02) −0.05 (0.03) −0.072 (−0.137 to −0.006)
Frontal gray matter volume, cm3 <75 −7.75 (0.35) −6.73 (0.38) −1.02 (−2.02 to −0.02) .76
≥75 −7.80 (0.67) −6.43 (0.80) −1.37 (−3.42 to 0.68)
SPARE-AD <75 0.27 (0.03) 0.24 (0.03) 0.033 (−0.042 to 0.107) .97
≥75 0.49 (0.05) 0.45 (0.06) 0.036 (−0.117 to 0.188)
Meta-ROI mean cortical thickness, mm <75 −0.10 (0.01) −0.10 (0.01) −0.002 (−0.031 to 0.026) .91
≥75 −0.11 (0.02) −0.10 (0.02) −0.006 (−0.063 to 0.052)
Mean FA in the cingulum bundle <75 −0.0004 (0.002) 0.002 (0.002) −0.003 (−0.008 to 0.002) .58
≥75 −0.006 (0.003) −0.006 (0.004) 0.0004 (−0.010 to 0.011)
Mean FA in the corpus callosum genu <75 −0.021 (0.003) −0.017 (0.003) −0.004 (−0.011 to 0.003) .69
≥75 −0.024 (0.005) −0.023 (0.006) −0.001 (−0.016 to 0.014)
CBF in the posterior cingulate gyrus, mL/100 mg/min <75 0.03 (1.28) −1.93 (1.36) 1.96 (−1.70 to 5.63) .41
≥75 0.13 (2.38) 1.63 (2.88) −1.50 (−8.84 to 5.85)
rCBF in the posterior cingulate gyrus relative to putamen <75 −0.10 (0.02) −0.08 (0.03) −0.021 (−0.090 to 0.047) .64
≥75 −0.07 (0.04) −0.01 (0.05) −0.058 (−0.195 to 0.079)
Frontal gray matter CBF, mL/100 mg/min <75 1.49 (1.03) −1.15 (1.08) 2.64 (−0.27 to 5.56) .40
≥75 0.57 (1.96) 0.78 (2.28) −0.21 (−6.12 to 5.70)

Abbreviations: CBF, cerebral blood flow; FA, fractional anisotropy; rCBF, regional cerebral blood flow; ROI, region of interest; SPARE-AD, spatial pattern for recognition of Alzheimer disease.

a

Estimates based on a linear mixed model adjusting for sex, intracranial volume (for hippocampal volume, frontal gray matter volume, and SPARE-AD), and days since randomization, with random effects for participant and magnetic resonance imaging facility. Change denotes estimated least square mean comparing follow-up (estimated at 3.98 years postrandomization); negative values denote decreases from baseline, while positive values indicate increases from baseline. Difference in change reflects intensive treatment group minus standard treatment group.