Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Oct 1;63(10):852–856. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002298

Table 4.

Summary of linear regression analysis demonstrating perceived COVID-19 vulnerability adjusted for confounding.

β SE B t 95% CI P Value
Outcome:
COVID-19 Vulnerability
(n = 446)
Model 0.002
Age −0.01 0.00 −2.06 −0.01, −0.00 0.040
Female Sex 0.07 0.06 1.12 −0.06, 0.20 0.263
Education: Degree −0.10 0.07 −1.35 −0.24, 0.04 0.178
Advanced Degree −0.13 0.11 −1.25 −0.35, 0.08 0.211
Health Condition 0.26 0.07 3.39 0.11, 0.40 0.001
Positive Infection History 0.08 0.08 0.91 −0.09, 0.25 0.361
Social Media Exposure 0.05 0.03 1.69 −0.01, 0.10 0.091

Note. Sex was coded dichotomously such that 0 = Male and 1 = Female; three HCWs who preferred not to answer or selected third gender were not included in this model due to small numbers. Education was coded such that 0 = no degree program; 1 = degree program and 2 = advanced degree program; 7 HCWs with “other” responses were not included in this model due to small numbers. Positive Infection History was coded such that 0 = no infection history and/or did not get tested for COVID-19 and 1 = tested positive for COVID-19. Age was analyzed as a continuous variable; subjects provided their age in response to the question “How old are you?”