Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: RSC Adv. 2021 May 17;11(29):17809–17827. doi: 10.1039/d1ra02557k

Table 1.

Benefits and drawbacks of materials used for bone repair

Material Sub-class Benefits Drawbacks Novel developments
Metals Stainless steel, titanium High load bearing
  • Permanent fixture

  • Stress-shielding

  • Risk of infection

  • Secondary surgery to remove implant

  • Limited osseointegration

  • Surface coatings

  • Nanopatterned surfaces

Magnesium
  • High load bearing

  • Biodegradable

  • Rapid dissolution of metal

  • Implant failure

  • Risk of infection

Addition of other metal ions
Zinc
  • Biocompatbile

  • Antibacterial

  • Low mechanical properties

  • Releases large zinc ions harmful to cells

  • Porous structures

  • Calcium phosphate coatings

Ceramics Bioglass
  • Bioactive

  • Osteoconductive

  • Integration with host bone

  • Antibacterial

  • Brittle

  • Low fracture toughness

  • Poor osteoinductivity

Metal doping
Calcium phosphates
  • Osteoinductive

  • Resorbable

  • Injectable as a cement, shapeable

  • Brittle

  • Slow resorption

  • Limited mechanical strength

  • Metal doping

  • Addition to polymers as coatings

Silica nanomaterials
  • Low cytotoxicity

  • High porosity

  • High mechanical strength

  • Biocompatible

  • Tunable pore size

  • Drug delivery vehicles

  • Osteogenic

  • Promotes vasculature

  • Risk of infection

  • Crystallinity impacts biocompatibility

  • Aggregation of nanoparticles

  • High concentrations can lead to particle setting and cytotoxic effects

  • Concentration limits

  • Risk of infection

  • Surface modifications

  • Combination with polymers

Polymers Polylactic acid (PLA)
  • Biocompatible

  • Biodegradable

  • Easily 3D-printed into specific shapes and porosities

  • Shorter degradation time than PCL (6 + months)

  • High mechanical properties

  • Acidic degradation products may cause inflammation

  • Risk of infection

  • Coat with calcium phosphate

  • Blend with multiple polymers

Polycaprolactone (PCL)
  • Flexible

  • Hydrophobic

  • Biodegradable

  • Biocompatible

  • Easily 3D-printed into specific shapes and porosities

  • Shape-memory fabrication

  • Low mechanical stiffness Long degradation times

  • Acidic degradation products

  • High transition temperature for shape actuation

  • Risk of infection

  • Blend with multiple polymers

  • Use different polymer conformations (star)

Collagen
  • Tunable pore size

  • Biocompatible

  • Sequester growth factors easily

  • Low mechanical properties

  • Disease transmission risk

  • Need mineral to induce osteogenesis

  • Risk of infection

  • Reinforce with stronger materials

  • Collagen derived from marine sources

  • Add calcium phosphate

Chitosan
  • Antibacterial

  • Anti-inflammatory

  • Poor mechanical properties

  • Low cell attachment

  • Poor osteoconductivity

  • Need mineral to induce osteogenesis

  • Reinforce with stronger materials

  • Modify fabrication (granular hydrogels)