Table 1.

The CASP14 target highlights

Target	PDB	Length, aa	Method	Res, Å	Stoichiom	Best model			Runner-up model
						GDT	lDDT	QS	GDT	lDDT	QS
H1036	6VN1	856	EM	2.8	A3B3C3			0.77			0.74
T1036s1	6VN1	622	EM	2.8	A1	90.22	0.82		88.12	0.83
H1060	-	1106	EM	3.2	A6B3C12D6
T1061	-	949	EM	3.2	A3	61.78	0.73		38.85	0.54
H1065	7M5F	225	X-Ray	1.59	A1B1			0.69			0.64
T1065s1	7M5F	127	X-Ray	1.59	A1	95.59	0.90		91.39	0.81
T1065s2	7M5F	98	X-Ray	1.59	A1	98.47	0.91		96.17	0.85
T1034	6Y75, 6TMM	156	X-Ray	2.3 2.4	A4	93.59	0.85		87.02	0.75
T1054	6V4V	190	X-Ray	1.65	A2	92.13	0.87		86.36	0.81
T1057	7M6B	287	X-Ray	1.9	A1	94.41	0.90		89.23	0.77
T1068	-	211	X-Ray	1.78	A1	96.09	0.91		61.03	0.56
T1074	7OC9	202	X-Ray	1.5	A1	89.77	0.84		60.61	0.58
T1078	7CWJ	138	X-Ray	1.25	A2	95.93	0.92		85.66	0.79
T1083	-	98	X-Ray	1.35	A2, coil-coil	87.77	0.74		87.77	0.74
T1084	-	73	X-Ray	1.93	A2, coil-coil	92.96	0.84		92.61	0.82
T1087	-	93	X-Ray	1.35	A2, coil-coil	96.77	0.90		86.02	0.72
T1099	6YGH	262	EM	3.7	A1	79.07	0.80		56.18	0.62
T1101	-	318	X-Ray	1.4	A1	87.12	0.86		62.29	0.72

Note: Columns indicate target ID, PDB ID, length, experimental method, resolution, stoichiometry, and CASP14 assessment results of the winner and runner-up model for each target