Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney360. 2021 Feb;2(2):279–289. doi: 10.34067/KID.0004422020

Table 4.

Logistic regression of CAC status with arginine/proline metabolism, urea cycle, and bile-acid synthesis

Pathway Unadjusteda
Adjusted for Demographics
Fully Adjusted
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Arginine/proline metabolism 1.43 (1.06 to 1.92) 0.02 1.83 (1.06 to 3.15) 0.03 1.84 (1.04 to 3.27) 0.04
Urea cycle 1.93 (1.34 to 2.80) <0.001 1.58 (0.93 to 2.69) 0.09 1.66 (0.94 to 2.91) 0.08
Bile-acid synthesis 0.99 (0.82 to 1.20) 0.92 1.09 (0.84 to 1.41) 0.51 1.64 (0.97 to 2.75) 0.06

Demographics included age, sex, and race. Full models were adjusted for demographics and statin use for arginine/proline metabolism and urea cycle pathways; for the bile-acid synthesis pathway, full models were adjusted for demographics; coronary artery disease; and use of calcium-based phosphate binder, RAAS blockade, and statin. CAC, coronary artery calcification; OR, odds ratio; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

a

Per 1 unit higher in the first principal component score of each pathway.