Table 1.
Patients | Total cohort | UWCCC | OIL | p * |
---|---|---|---|---|
N = 58 (%) | N = 29 (%) | N = 29 (%) | ||
Age; mean (±sd) (yr) | 61 (14) | 57 (15) | 65 (13) | 0.02 |
Gender | 1 | |||
Male | 32 (55%) | 16 (55%) | 16 (55%) | |
Actionable mutation | 0.4 | |||
BRAF wild type | 38 (66%) | 18 (62%) | 20 (69%) | |
BRAF mutated | 10 (17%) | 5 (17%) | 5 (17%) | |
Mutations other than BRAF | 7 (12%) | 6 (21%) | 1 (4%) | |
Unknown | 3 (5%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (10%) | |
ECOG performance status | 0.001 | |||
0 | 30 (51%) | 17 (59%) | 13 (45%) | |
1 | 15 (26%) | 3 (10%) | 12 (41%) | |
2 | 4 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (14%) | |
Unknown | 9 (16%) | 9 (31%) | 0 (0%) | |
Anatomic site of primary | 0.6 | |||
Cutaneous | 48 (83%) | 21 (73%) | 27 (94%) | |
Mucosal | 4 (7%) | 3 (10%) | 1 (3%) | |
Ocular | 2 (3%) | 2 (7%) | 0 (0%) | |
Unknown primary | 4 (7%) | 3 (10%) | 1 (3%) | |
Treatment setting | 0.001 | |||
Adjuvant setting | 10 (17%) | 10 (34%) | 0 (0%) | |
Metastatic setting | 48 (83%) | 19 (66%) | 29 (100%) | |
Best response — only for metastatic disease (N=48) | 0.8 | |||
Complete response | 17 (35%) | 8 (42%) | 9 (31%) | |
Progressive disease | 10 (21%) | 5 (26%) | 5 (17%) | |
Radiographic response | 14 (29%) | 3 (16%) | 11 (38%) | |
Mixed radiographic response | 6 (13%) | 2 (11%) | 4 (14%) | |
Other | 1 (2%) | 1 (5%) | 0 (0%) | |
Number of 18F-FDG PET/CT per patient, median (range) | 4 (2–16) | 3 (2–16) | 4 (2–11) | 0.5 |
Sd standard deviation, UWCCC University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Centre, OIL Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Slovenia,.
p value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test to compare the statistical difference in patients characteristics between UWCCC and OIL