Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Dec 27;49(6):1857–1869. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05650-3

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Patients Total cohort UWCCC OIL p *
N = 58 (%) N = 29 (%) N = 29 (%)
Age; mean (±sd) (yr) 61 (14) 57 (15) 65 (13) 0.02
Gender 1
 Male 32 (55%) 16 (55%) 16 (55%)
Actionable mutation 0.4
 BRAF wild type 38 (66%) 18 (62%) 20 (69%)
 BRAF mutated 10 (17%) 5 (17%) 5 (17%)
 Mutations other than BRAF 7 (12%) 6 (21%) 1 (4%)
 Unknown 3 (5%) 0 (0%) 3 (10%)
ECOG performance status 0.001
 0 30 (51%) 17 (59%) 13 (45%)
 1 15 (26%) 3 (10%) 12 (41%)
 2 4 (7%) 0 (0%) 4 (14%)
 Unknown 9 (16%) 9 (31%) 0 (0%)
Anatomic site of primary 0.6
 Cutaneous 48 (83%) 21 (73%) 27 (94%)
 Mucosal 4 (7%) 3 (10%) 1 (3%)
 Ocular 2 (3%) 2 (7%) 0 (0%)
 Unknown primary 4 (7%) 3 (10%) 1 (3%)
Treatment setting 0.001
 Adjuvant setting 10 (17%) 10 (34%) 0 (0%)
 Metastatic setting 48 (83%) 19 (66%) 29 (100%)
Best response — only for metastatic disease (N=48) 0.8
 Complete response 17 (35%) 8 (42%) 9 (31%)
 Progressive disease 10 (21%) 5 (26%) 5 (17%)
 Radiographic response 14 (29%) 3 (16%) 11 (38%)
 Mixed radiographic response 6 (13%) 2 (11%) 4 (14%)
 Other 1 (2%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%)
Number of 18F-FDG PET/CT per patient, median (range) 4 (2–16) 3 (2–16) 4 (2–11) 0.5

Sd standard deviation, UWCCC University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Centre, OIL Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Slovenia,.

*

p value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test to compare the statistical difference in patients characteristics between UWCCC and OIL