Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Heart. 2022 Mar 30;6(2):100014. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100014

Table 1: Patient characteristics.

Normal continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation while non-normal variables are reported as median with first and third quartiles (Q1 and Q3, respectively). Categorical variables are reported as number (percentage).

“Classic ” NFHG “Discordant” NFLG “Paradoxical” pLFLG
(n=27) (n=27) (n=27) p-value
Clinical Characteristics
 Age, years 80 ± 9 81 ± 9 82 ± 14 0.73
 Gender, male 15 (56%) 13 (48%) 16 (59%) 0.71
 BSA, m2 1.9 (1.7 to 2) 1.7 (1.6 to 1.9) 1.9 (1.6 to 2) 0.15
 BMI, kg/m2 26 ± 5 26 ± 5 28 ± 11 0.65
Echocardiographic Characteristics
 Aortic Valve area, cm2 0.87 (0.72 to 0.91) 0.8 (0.71 to 0.92) 0.74 (0.65 to 0.86) 0.13
 Aortic Mean Gradient, mmHg 45 (41 to 55) , 34 (28 to 37)* 31 (23 to 35)* <0.01
 LV Stroke Volume Index, mL/m2 50 ± 11, 42 ± 6*, 30 ± 6*, <0.01
 LV Ejection Fraction, % 69 ± 8 64 ± 9* 64 ± 8 0.03
 Mitral Regurgitation, % >Moderate 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.0
 Tricuspid Regurgitation, % >Moderate 0 (0.0%) 1 (3.7%) 2 (7.4%) 0.35
 Aortic Regurgitation, % >Moderate 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.0
 PASP, mmHg 33 (26 to 43) 33 (22 to 42) 39 (31 to 48) 0.25

NFHG: normal-flow high-gradient aortic stenosis, NFLG: normal-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis, pLFLG: paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis

*

p<0.05 compared NFHG AS

p<0.05 compared to NFLG AS

p<0.05 compared to pLFLG AS