Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Genet Couns. 2022 Aug 5;31(6):1383–1393. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1613

Table 4:

Qualitative themes and example quotes

Would your willingness to participate in the study change if you had been provided the following language?
Theme Consent Example quotes
Discrimination Received more information about gaps in second Consent scenario • “My information would be much more exposed with the new language.”
• “I may not be able to get other types of insurance. Or types of loans.”
• “Because it says I'm not protected.”
• “It would allow wholesale discrimination.”
• “Long term care could be important, why chance an insurance company discriminating against me?”
• “It adds the information that would lead me to believe it could put me at a risk in other areas that may affect my life negatively.”
Received less information in second Consent scenario • “Willingness would increase because sentences detailing exclusions were omitted.”
• “It removed the discrimination against life insurance”
• “eliminated my cause for concern”
Please explain your answer to: based on the informed consent language, do you believe you are at risk of genetic discrimination?
Theme Likert* Example quotes
Family History/ Personal history of disease Lower perceived risk • “I do not have any genetic disorders that would make me susceptible to discrimination.”
• “Not many diseases run in my family.”
• “I don’t think that my genetics will show any abnormalities to increase my risk of developing any kind of disease.”
Higher perceived risk • “Mother had Alzheimer’s.”
• “There is a high number of cancer and diabetic deaths in my family.”
• “I do not want a lot of my genetic information getting around as I have a history of diabetes, familial lipidemia, and heart disease in my family. If that gets out to potential employers, I will not get hired.”
Employment & insurance status Lower perceived risk • “I work for a large company. I already have health insurance. I am comfortable with my role in the company and know I will retire from there. I have enough investments to cover an unforeseen disability or if I need long term care.”
• “I am retired and have Medicare. I don’t think the results of a test should affect my healthcare. If so, we are all in trouble.”
• “I am not employed or seeking any additional insurance.”
Higher perceived risk • “I work for a company with only five employees so the laws would not protect me.”
• “GINA only applies to firms above 15 employees. If I work for a small company and the information is captured, it can leak to other public databases and be swept up into my online data persona.”
Race/racial appearance Lower perceived risk • “I'm white in appearance.”
• “My descendants originated in Spain and Portugal. I'm very light skinned and have never been discriminated against ever.”
• “I’m not at risk because I am not a minority.”
Higher perceived risk • “I’m black.”
• “Because of my race and economic background.”
• “I believe anyone who isn’t white is at risk.”
• “I believe that black people would be targeted.”
Trust in laws and protections Lower perceived risk • “Because they cannot discriminate against me if they have 15 or more employees.”
• “No, I think GINA is good enough to protect me from genetic discrimination.”
• “I feel safe that my information will not be made available to anyone else.”
Higher perceived risk • “If this information is available to insurance companies, a person can be denied life insurance, health care insurance and long term health care insurance.”
• “Because life insurance, lenders and others can discriminate if they find something about my health.”
• “Nothing is confidential anymore.”
• “I do not trust insurance companies to treat me fairly based upon projections of conditions which I MAY or may NOT acquire, no matter the probability. Money rules all.”

Note: “Lower perceived risk” were responses of 1–3, “higher perceived risk” were responses of 5–7.

*

Scale anchors of Not at all at risk (1) and At high risk (7)