Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2021 Dec 9;53(7):2982–2991. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721005006

Table 3.

Interpretation of the best-performing model shown in Figure 1

Node number (see Figure 1) Directions
1 a) Within-person cumulative mean of ideation duration greater than 0.95 = Move to node 3
b) Otherwise, move to node 2
2 a) Within-person cumulative mean of hopelessness is greater than 2.19 = No next day ideation
b) Otherwise, move to node 4
3 a) Within-person change score of ideation duration is greater than −1 = Move to node 6
b) Otherwise, move to node 5
4 a) Within-person cumulative mean of burdensomeness is greater than 1.95 = Move to node 7
b) Otherwise, no next day ideation
5 a) Within-person cumulative mean of ideation duration is greater than 2.54 = Next day ideation
b) Otherwise, no next day ideation
6 a) Within-person cumulative mean of burdensomeness is greater than 4.82 = Next day ideation
b) Otherwise, move to node 8
7 a) Within-person change score of self-efficacy is greater than −1.59 = No next day ideation
b) Otherwise, next day ideation
8 a) Within-person cumulative mean score of self-efficacy is greater than 8.86 = No next day ideation
b) Otherwise, next day ideation