Table 2.
Pathologic Analysis by Mechanistic Hypothesis
Hypothesis | Analysis (Stain) | Hypothesis | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Mechanical | Elastic fibers (Weigert Resorcin/Fuschin) Collagen fibers (trichrome) Leaflet thickness |
Chronic flow drag forces and friction on the valve cause strain, stretch, and fibrotic tissue deposition | Compared with control valves, HCM residual leaflets showed: 1. An expanded spongiosa layer with increased, fragmented, and disorganized elastic fibers 2. An attenuated, disrupted, and disorganized collagenous fibrosa layer 3. An added layer of super-imposed collagenous tissue overlying both atrial and ventricular surfaces 4. Elongated, slack and curlicued chordae and a trend to decreased leaflet thickness |
Developmental | Epicardium derived cells (TBX-18) Paracrine signaling from epicardium-derived cells (periostin) |
Dysregulated stem cell differentiation during valve development | No difference in number of epicardium-derived cells No significant difference in amount of paracrine signaling |
Adaptive | Endocardial-to-mesenchymal transition (CD31-αSMA) Valvular interstitial cells (vimentin) Inflammatory cells (CD45) |
Adaptive cell lines activate in response to chronic tethering forces | No evidence of endocardial-to-mesenchymal transition in HCM or control valves No difference in valvular interstitial or inflammatory cells |
Genetic | Cardiomyocytes (cardiac troponin I) | Persistence of mutated cardiomyocytes in the valve | No cardiomyocytes in HCM or control valves |
HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Tbx-18 = t-box transcription factor 18.