Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertension. 2023 Jul 20;80(10):1980–1992. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21314

TABLE 2.

Summary of evidence, gaps in knowledge, and research priorities.

Evidence Gaps in Knowledge
Criteria Definition Evidence Summary Score Gaps Priority
i Proof of concept Ability to distinguish between subjects Distinguishes CAD, HF, TOD, CV pathology 4 Data: beyond East Asia 1
ii Prospective validation Future CVD morbidity/mortality predictive ability High vs. low baPWV: CVD morbidity (HR: 2.6-3.4, RR: 3.0), CVD mortality (HR: 1.2-2.6, RR: 5.4), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.8-2.5) 4 Data: beyond East Asia 2
iii Incremental value Predictive information beyond standard risk markers CV event prediction ↑ when added to ACC/AHA risk score (X2: 21 to 50), ABI (AUC: 0.72 to 0.83), CTTA (X2: 132 to 154), SPECT (X2: 24 to 27), FMD (AUC: 0.71 to 0.75), & hs-CRP (X2: 126 to 167) 4 Data: beyond East Asia & in general populations 3
iv Clinical utility Ability to move patients from one risk category to another CV events: IDI = 1.6%, NRI = 52%. 3 Limited data from prospective studies in independent populations 3
v Clinical outcomes Impact of clinical management with biomarker on clinical outcomes No data available 1 Clinical management: support for aiding treatment 4
vi Cost-effectiveness Incremental costs vs incremental benefits (life expectancy and QoL) No data available, though likely high considering clinical utility & low examination costs 2 Clinical management: impact on life expectancy & QoL 2
vii Ease of use Simplicity of measurement procedures Measurements automated following cuff placement 3 Implementation studies: best practices for implementing within clinical workflow 5
viii Methodological consensus Uniformity of measurements in different clinical settings. No known guidelines exist 1 Consensus statement: measurement conformity across clinics, facilitating comparison to reference values 5
ix Reference values Availability of published reference or cut-off values Reference values for Chinese populations 2 Data: beyond East Asia 4
Median evidence score 4

Evidence Score / Gaps Priority Likert scale: 1 = very low; 2 = low; 3 = medium, 4 = high, 5 = very high. Abbreviations: ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CAD, coronary artery disease; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; HF, heart failure; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HR, hazard ratio; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; NRI, net reclassification index; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; QoL, quality of life; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; TOD, target organ damage; X2, global chi squared.