Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heredity (Edinb). 2010 May 19;106(2):310–318. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.59

Table 1.

Genetic diversity for L. alabamica populations. Populations are ordered by size and self-incompatibility status. Standard errors are shown where available. Pp = percent polymorphic loci; Total Ap = total number of alleles per population (including monomorphic loci); APp = mean number of alleles per polymorphic locus; Aep = mean effective number of alleles per locus; Hop = observed heterozygosity; Hep = expected heterozygosity (genetic diversity); I = Nei’s genetic identity.

Pop. N Pop. Size SI Status Lloyd’s Race§ Pp (%) Total Ap APp Aep Hop Hep Mean I
Isbell 30 L SI a1 57.9 40 2.91 1.45 ± .121 0.182 ± .053 0.234 ± .056 0.9295
Speck 23 L SI a1 68.4 40 2.62 1.45 ± .116 0.145 ± .046 0.246 ± .051 0.938
Hatton 112 L SI a1 68.4 42 2.77 1.34 ± .129 0.114 ± .041 0.167 ± .053 0.9191
Winchell 24 L SI a1 57.9 38 2.73 1.42 ± .124 0.137 ± .042 0.222 ± .054 0.9432
StCross 90 L SI a1 63.2 37 2.5 1.24 ± .070 0.110 ± .031 0.156 ± .039 0.9206
CR46 65 S SI a1 63.2 38 2.58 1.38 ± .048 0.165 ± .050 0.214 ± .051 0.9291
Landers 177 L SC a2 63.2 40 2.75 1.20 ± .078 0.065 ± .022 0.125 ± .039 0.8309
CPCC 104 S SC a3 52.6 31 2.2 1.07 ± .056 0.055 ± .050 0.038 ± .027 0.909
Tuscumbia 46 S SC Tuscumbia 42.1 27 2 1.07 ± .052 0.057 ± .051 0.041 ± .026 0.9114
Russell 32 S SC Russellville 31.6 25 2 1.09 ± .053 0.059 ± .049 0.057 ± .029 0.9032