Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 31;30(13):4746–4756. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0197-10.2010

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bilateral local stimulation in the NAc shell disrupts licking. (A) Schematic of the experimental paradigm. (B) Anatomical location of stimulation sites used simultaneously for bilateral stimulation (2–4 sites) in 4 rats coded by 4 colors (coronal schematics and AP coordinates are taken from the Paxinos and Watson rat atlas). (C) Example epochs from a session of sucrose licking before and during pseudo-random stimulation. Each black line in the raster plot represents a lick. In this and all other panels of this figure the gray area represents the timing of sucrose delivery and the red area the timing of local NAc stimulation. (D) Peri-lick interval histograms and lick raster plots of local stimulation. Stimulation trains were delivered pseudo-randomly in 20% of the trials during the session, but for the purpose of illustration stimulated (left column, stimulation duration in red) and non-stimulated (right column, dark gray histograms) trials are pooled and shown in separate diagrams. (E) The degree of lick disruption scales with stimulation intensity. Examples of peri-lick interval histograms of stimulated (left) and non-stimulated (right) trials (D and E: 100 ms bin size). (F) Data summary (n = 4 rats) of the effect of local stimulation on average lick rate (and SEM) during the time of stimulation (left) and during one second following stimulation (right). (G) Time to half-maximal lick suppression during stimulation onset (left) and half-maximal recovery following stimulation offset (right) for all stimulation intensities tested.