Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 15;100(6):1123–1129. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.176446

Table 4. Effects of HIV Status and Sexual Orientation on Bivariate Correlates of Willingness to Get an Anal Papanicolaou Test Among Gay and Bisexual Men: United States, January 2009.

HIV-Positive Participantsa (n = 51), Mean (SD) or No. (%) HIV-Negative Gay Participants (n = 186), Mean (SD) or No. (%) HIV-Negative Bisexual Participants (n = 69), Mean (SD) or No. (%)

Perceived knowledge of anal cancerb 1.76 (0.97) 1.51 (0.74) 1.33c (0.50)
Worry about anal cancerd 1.80 (1.06) 1.38e (0.67) 1.40c (0.69)
Perceived likelihood of anal cancerf 2.39 (0.80) 2.19 (0.57) 2.08c (0.73)
Belief that only people who have anal intercourse need anal Pap testsg 3.76 (1.19) 3.68 (1.07) 3.33 (1.20)
Awareness of anal Pap test
 No 23 (45) 149e,h (80) 63c (91)
 Yes 28 (55) 37 (20) 6 (9)
Had anal Pap test
 No 34 (67) 164e (88) 64c (93)
 Yes 17 (33) 22 (12) 5 (7)
Knew cost-effective frequency for anal Pap testing (1-3 y)
 No 22 (43) 103 (55) 38 (55)
 Yes 29 (57) 83 (45) 31 (45)
Had digital rectal exam
 No 11 (22) 46 (25) 22 (32)
 Yes 40 (78) 140 (75) 47 (68)
Disclosed sexual behavior with men to primary care provider
 Noi 4 (8) 62e,h (33) 54c (78)
 Yes 47 (92) 124 (67) 15 (22)
Annual household income, $
 <60 000 21 (41) 68 (37) 33 (48)
 ≥ 60 000 30 (59) 118 (63) 36 (52)

Note: Pap = Papanicolaou. Table contains variables bivariately associated with willingness to receive an anal Pap test. Sexual orientation and HIV status were not examined because they were used to create the 3 comparison groups.

a

HIV-positive cohort comprised 50 gay men and 1 bisexual man.

b

On a 4-point scale: 1 (nothing at all), 2 (a little), 3 (a moderate amount), 4 (quite a lot).

c

Difference between HIV-positive participants and HIV-negative bisexual men, P<.05.

d

On a 4-point scale: 1 (not at all), 2 (a little), 3 (a moderate amount), 4 (quite a lot).

e

Difference between HIV-positive participants and HIV-negative gay men, P<.05.

f

On a 5-point scale: 1 (no chance), 2 (low chance), 3 (moderate chance), 4 (high chance), 5 (certain I will get anal cancer).

g

On a 5-point scale: 1 (strongly agree), 2 (somewhat agree), 3 (neither agree nor disagree), 4 (somewhat disagree), 5 (strongly disagree).

h

Difference between HIV-negative gay and bisexual men, P<.05.

i

Included not applicable/missing (n = 39).