. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Apr 14;51(10):4875–4883. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4962

Table 3.

Disagreement types with corresponding color code. Disagreement between SD OCT and composite CFP drusen maps are evaluated at each image pixel for all 12 subjects (see Figure 9). Four major types of disagreement are reported. A brief title for each type of disagreement is presented in the middle column. For each type, area is reported as the mean percentage of the total disagreement ± standard deviation.

Type	Description of Disagreement Type	Number of Eyes	Mean % of Disagreement
IA	Undermarking of drusen borders by CFP	12	35 ± 21
IB	Undermarking of drusen borders by SD OCT	12	27 ± 14
IC	Nonspecific disagreement at drusen borders	12	18 ± 13
II	Hypopigmentation on CFP without SD OCT finding	11	10 ± 10
III	Pigmentary migration with obscuration of underlying druse	5	6 ± 9
IV	SD OCT deflection without corresponding pigmentary change	9	5 ± 5