Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Dent Res. 2009 Apr;88(4):367–371. doi: 10.1177/0022034509334203

Table 1.

Demographic variables, implant location, and bone type by glycemic levels (HbA1c)

HbA1c at 8 weeks Patients Implants Gender Age (y) Location Bone type (Number of implants)

n n Number female Mean ± SE Number mandible Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4
≤6.0 10 12 7 45.7 ± 3.1b 7 4 3 5 0
6.1 to 8 12 18 6 66.0 ± 2.2 12 0 7 10 1
8.1 to 10 5 5 2 54.4 ± 1.7 3 0 2 1 2
≥10.1 5 7 2 64.0 ± 5.1 5 2 2 2 1
Total number 32 42 17c 27d 6 14e 18e 4
Significancea p=0.7094 p=0.0001 p=0.9277 p=0.0610
a

Test of equality of HbA1c groups

b

HbA1c≤6.0 significantly (p≤0.05, Scheffe’s multiple comparison procedure) different from combined 6.1 to 8.0, 8.1 to 10.0, and ≥10.1

c

53.1% of subjects were female

d

64.3% of implants were in the mandible

e

76.2% of implants were in types II or II bone