Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;90(2):186–190. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.059824

Table 3.

Quality parameters v expert assessment (p values, Wilcoxon test comparing with “poor” scan values)

Excellent Acceptable Poor
SNR (dB) (n = 36) 40.2 (9.0) (0.04) (n = 4) 35.4 (5.5) (0.02) (n = 19) 30.0 (6.1) (n = 13)
SS (n = 45) 6.11 (1.54) (0.002) (n = 7) 5.53 (1.31) (<0.001) (n = 24) 3.21 (1.63) (n = 14)
QI (n = 63) 34.6 (6.9) (<0.001) (n = 9) 24.5 (6.4) (<0.001) (n = 32) 11.9 (2.9) (n = 22)

Only QI showed a significant difference between excellent and acceptable images (p = 0.001).