Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Aug 14;7(11):1337–1349. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0563

Table 2.

Caco-2 Invasion Efficiencies of Listeria monocytogenes 10403s and Select Mutants After Exposure to Varying Temperature Treatments

Growth temperature Temperature of PBS hold (2.5 h) Caco-2 invasion efficiency (calculated as [CFU recovered/CFU infected] × 100) (SD) fora
10403S ΔcheY ΔdegU ΔflaA ΔinlA
30°C None 0.67 (0.17)A 0.018 (0.007)B,* 0.015 (0.008)B,* 0.014 (0.010)B,* 0.024 (0.010)A,*
30°C 30°C 0.64 (0.19)A 0.013 (0.003)B,* 0.010 (0.005)B,* 0.010 (0.006)B,* 0.023 (0.007)A,*
30°C 37°C 0.36 (0.10)A 0.006 (0.002)B,* 0.007 (0.002)B,* 0.007 (0.004)B,* 0.014 (0.005)A,*
37°C None 0.14 (0.03)B 0.14 (0.06)A 0.20 (0.05)A 0.14 (0.06)A 0.0008 (0.0003)B,*
37°C 37°C 0.11 (0.04)B 0.12 (0.05)A 0.14 (0.10)A 0.09 (0.06)A 0.0007 (0.0007)B,*
37°C 30°C 0.11 (0.03)B 0.13 (0.05)A 0.17 (0.08)A 0.14 (0.07)A 0.0007 (0.0005)B,*
a

Within a given column values with identical letters (A or B) are not significantly different (p ≥ 0.05; post hoc Tukey HSD test). Within a given row, invasion efficiencies that are lower for a given mutant than the parent strain exposed to the same condition (p ≤ 0.05; post hoc Dunnett’s test) are marked with an asterisk (*). Data represent the mean and standard deviation of three biological replicates.

PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SD, standard deviation; ANOVA, analysis of variance; HSD, honestly significantly different.