Table 4.
Establishments with no condom use policy | Establishments with condom use policy | % difference | |
---|---|---|---|
(1) Effect of a 10% increase in condom use knowledge | |||
Control | 6.57 | 7.28 | 10.81 |
Peer | 6.82 | 7.95 | 16.57 |
Managerial | 7.19 | 8.46 | 17.66 |
Combined peer + managerial | 7.87 | 9.42 | 19.70 |
(2) Effect of a 10% increase in condom use attitudes | |||
Control | 6.82 | 7.52 | 10.26 |
Peer | 7.07 | 8.19 | 15.84 |
Managerial | 7.44 | 8.71 | 17.07 |
Combined peer + managerial | 8.11 | 9.67 | 19.24 |
(3) Effect of a 10% increase in self-efficacy | |||
Control | 6.63 | 7.34 | 10.71 |
Peer | 6.88 | 8.01 | 16.42 |
Managerial | 7.25 | 8.52 | 17.52 |
Combined peer + managerial | 7.93 | 9.48 | 19.55 |
Expected values were estimated from the hierarchical linear models, and computed separately for three scenarios. We assume a hypothetical increase of 10% in (1) knowledge, (2) attitudes and (3) self-efficacy