Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 24;30(8):3022–3042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4029-09.2010

Table 2.

Statistics of response modulation during sinusoidal rotation (0.5 Hz)

Yaw
rotation
Roll
rotation
Pitch
rotation
Max
Direction
p_f1<=0.01 All (n=364) 29 (8%) 68 (19%) 59 (16%) 114 (31%)
Upper bank (n=136) 17 (12%) 40 (29%) 33 (24%) 64 (47%)
Tip (n=126) 7 (6%) 23 (18%) 20 (16%) 37 (29%)
Lower bank (n=102) 5 (5%) 5 (5%) 6 (6%) 13 (13%)
p_f2<=0.01 &
p_f1>0.01
All (n=364) 51 (14%) 40 (11%) 28 (8%) 66 (18%)
Upper bank (n=136) 7 (5%) 9 (7%) 4 (3%) 9 (7%)
Tip (n=126) 17 (14%) 9 (7%) 6 (5%) 19 (15%)
Lower bank (n=102) 27 (26%) 22 (22%) 18 (18%) 38 (37%)
p_f1>0.01 &
p_f2 >0.01
All (n=364) 284 (78%) 256 (70%) 277 (76%) 184 (51%)
Upper bank (n=136) 112 (82%) 87 (64%) 99 (73%) 63 (46%)
Tip (n=126) 102 (81%) 94 (75%) 100 (79%) 70 (56%)
Lower bank (n=102) 70 (69%) 75 (74%) 78 (76%) 51 (50%)

Data shown represent number of cells and corresponding percentages relative to the total population (bold), upper bank, tip and lower bank for each row, respectively. Data recorded in monkey U (n=247: left hemisphere and 51: right hemisphere) and monkey J (n=21: left hemisphere and 45: right hemisphere).