Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7900–7909. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0438-11.2011

Table 1.

Photopic visual acuity (in cyc/deg) in various mouse strains

Mouse strains 1.85 log cd m−2 2.57 log cd m−2 p2-value RPE65 variant
Irbp+/+Tα−/− (n = 5) 0.71 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.02 0.002
Irbp−/−Tα−/− (n = 5) 0.66 ± 0.02 0.69 ± 0.02 0.22 Leu450
p1-value 0.041 0.003
129S2/Sv (n = 5) 0.74 ± 0.01 0.78 ± 0.01 0.04
Irbp−/− [129S2/Sv] (n = 5) 0.66 ± 0.03 0.69 ± 0.02 0.41 Leu450
p1-value 0.019 0.007
C57Bl/6 (n = 5) 0.74 ± 0.02 0.82 ± 0.02 0.02
Irbp−/− [C57Bl/6] (n = 3) 0.71 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.02 0.15 Met450
p1-value 0.50 0.24

Data were derived from mouse optomotor responses to rotating gratings under two photopic background illumination conditions (1.85 log cd m−2 or 2.57 log cd m−2). Values are means ± SEM. Significance levels: p1-values indicate comparisons between specified pairs of mouse strains (within the same background light intensity), and p2-values indicate comparisons within the same mouse strain (between two different illumination conditions).