Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 14;31(37):13157–13167. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2701-11.2011

Table 5.

Reinforcement model parameters: model estimating separate fits for each feedback timing condition

IMMED (1 s) DELAY (4 s) DELAY (7 s)



Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM)
Learning rate (α)a   0.16 (0.05)   0.33 (0.06)   0.21 (0.06)
Softmax inverse temperature (β)   2.56 (0.37)   2.49 (0.37)   2.60 (0.41)
Pseudo-r2   0.24 (0.04)   0.29 (0.05)   0.22 (0.04)
Model fit (log likelihood)b 31.54 (1.77) 29.33 (2.07) 32.41 (1.63)
Chance model fit 41.59 41.59 41.59
Likelihood ratio test p = 0.005 p < 0.0005 p = 0.003
a

Learning rates did not differ as a function of delay (linear effect: F(1,19) = 0.315, p = 0.58).

b

Fit did not differ as a function of delay (linear effect: F(1,19) = 0.22, p = 0.65).