Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 16;31(46):16814–16825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3064-11.2011

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Functional contributions of Ih. A, Representative voltage response from an Hcn1-deficient cell, again demonstrating a loss of the sag and the rebound potentials. B, Voltage response of an Hcn2-deficient cell, demonstrating normal sag and rebound potentials. C, Voltage response from an HCN2-AYA transfected cell demonstrating the loss of Ih. The scale bars apply to panels A-C and the horizontal lines indicate −60 mV. D-F, Mean values taken from current-clamp measurements of resting potential (D), the sag potential (E) and the rebound potential (F). Figure 7. Function contributions of Ih. A representative voltage response from an Hcn1-deficient cell, again demonstrating a loss of the sag and the rebound potentials. A, Voltage response of an Hcn2-deficient cell, demonstrating normal sag and rebound potentials. B, Voltage response from an HCN2-AYA transfected cell demonstrating the loss of Ih. C-E, Mean values taken from current-clamp measurements of resting potential (C), the sag potential (D) and the rebound potential (E). Resting potential was measured from the first 50 data points at the beginning of the trace with current clamped at 0 pA. The sag potential was measured as the difference between the peak hyperpolarization and steady-state hyperpolarization near the end of the current step. The rebound was measured as the difference between resting potential and the peak depolarization at the end of the step. Mean values were measured as the average from 8 control cells and the same 8 cells following exposure to either 100 μM ZD7288 or 10 μM Cilobradine, 25 wild-type cells, 5 cells exposed to the HCN2-AYA construct, 20 cells from Hcn1-deficient mice and 7 cells from Hcn2-deficient mice. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*: p<0.05; ***: p<0.001) relative to WT. G, Magnified view of two representative rebound potentials. Trace from a wild-type cell (thin line) and an Hcn1 knockout cell (thick line) are shown. Arrowheads mark the peak rebound potentials. H, Scatter plot showing latency measured as the temporal difference between the end of the step and the peak rebound potential. Solid lines represent means. The variability in control, wild-type, and Hcn2- deficient cells was minimal, while cells exposed to blockers, dominant-negative constructs, or cells deficient in Hcn1 showed considerable variation.