Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Jun;5(3):250–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00389.x

Table 4.

ECER Conference Evaluation and 6 month follow-up survey*

Conference Component 2009
N=141
Agree or Strongly Agree %
2010
N= 156
Agree or Strongly Agree %
Location was convenient 87% 93%
Hotel met my expectations 89% 96%
Information presented was useful 90% 96%
Conference provided new knowledge on community engagement 89% 90%
Diverse groups were represented 79% 92%
I have better access to CE resources now 55% 75%
I have used tools I learned at the conference 52% 73%
I have formed new relationships Not asked 79%
New collaborations have developed with others from the conference 71% 69%
*

2011 conference 6-month follow-up pending