Table 4.
Bird ID | Dose1 | DPI 0 | DPI 1 | DPI 2 | DPI 3 | DPI 4 | DPI 5 | DPI 6 | DPI 7 | DPI 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | Control | -2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
70 | Control | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
7 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
9 | 2 | - | 38.093 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
11 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
16 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
20 | 2 | - | 39.513 | - | - | -c | - | -c | - | - |
51 | 2 | - | 38.233 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
52 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
59 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
53 | 4 | - | - | 37.6 | 37.85* | 32.46* | - | -c | - | - |
54 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
67 | 4 | - | 30.1* | 30.08* | 34.18c | - | - | - | - | - |
66 | 4 | - | - | 33.85 | 33.99 | - | 37.82 | - | - | - |
57 | 6 | - | - | - | - | 39.79 | 37.56 | - | - | - |
58 | 6 | - | 34.95 | 37.21 | 36.26 | 34.64 | 38.24 | - | - | - |
60 | 6 | - | 33.85 | 35.2 | 38.63 | - | - | - | - | - |
62 | 6 | - | 37.11 | 35.4 | 32.55 | - | - | 38.93 | - | 39.7 |
4 | 6 | - | 30.89c | 32.1 | 35.54 | - | - | - | - | - |
69 | 6 | - | 30.8c | 36.64 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Inocula doses expressed as Log10EID50/100µl. No bird inoculated with lower viral titers became infected based on viral excretion and seroconversion (not shown).
Ct values are from RT-PCR analyses using avian influenza H5 specific primers and probe. Samples with no Ct values are shown with -.
Indicates that RT-PCR positive cloacal swabs were detected on the DPI shown.
The presence of viral RNA detected on DPI1 only was assumed to be residual inoculum.
Presence of viable virus confirmed by virus isolation in embryonating egg culture.