Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2010 May 12;30(19):6751–6762. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5080-09.2010

Table 2.

Numbers of mice examined from each genotype for each of the physiological and histological analyses performed in the present study

M1 M3 M5 M2 M4 M2/M4
Thresholds (ABR/DPOAE) +/+=26 +/+=29 +/+=22 +/+=16 +/+=16 +/+=10
−/−=13 −/−=13 −/−=14 −/−=8 −/−=8 −/−=11
Efferent function +/+=4 +/+=8 +/+=4 +/+=5
−/−=5 −/−=10 −/−=3 −/−=6
Temporary noise damage +/+=4 +/+=6 +/+=6 +/+=6 +/+=36 +/+=7
−/−=3 −/−=3 −/−=4 −/−=4 −/−=4 −/−=7
Permanent noise damage +/+=4 +/+=8 +/+=8 +/+=8 +/+=8 +/+=7
−/−=3 −/−=5 −/−=8 −/−=8 −/−=8 −/−=7
Cochlear histopathology +/+=3 +/+=3 +/+=3 +/+=2
−/−=5 −/−=3 −/−=3 −/−=2

Histopathology and efferent function were not evaluated in the M2 or M4 single nulls, once we determined that the double nulls (M2/M4) were normal by both these assays.