Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 18;32(29):9969–9980. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1384-12.2012

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Frequency tuning of spike rate and first spike latency in layer 4 pyramidal neurons of the rat A1. A, A schematic demonstration of a potential degradation of latency tuning when multiple thalamic (TH) inputs with diverse characteristic frequencies (CF) converge onto a layer 4 (L4) neuron. Bottom, each colored dashed curve represents spike latency tuning of the corresponding thalamic neuron. Solid gray curve represents the latency tuning of the summed input. B, Tone-evoked spike responses in an example neuron examined by the cell-attached recording. Each small trace (100ms) represents the recorded trace to a tone of a particular frequency and intensity. Vertical deflections are spikes. C, Color map of the cell’s first spike latency within the frequency-intensity space. The space outside the determined tonal receptive field is colored with grey. D, Raster plot of spike timing for the responses at 60 dB intensity. For each testing frequency 5 trials are presented. E, The frequency tuning curve of average responses (solid black) and that of responses in a single trial (none or one spike within a 62.5 ms analysis window, cross). Left, spike rate. Right, spike latency. F, Best frequency (BF) determined by spike rate tuning vs. that by spike latency tuning. Each symbol represents data from the same cell (n = 34 cells). Red line is the best-fit linear regression line.