Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Nov 23;5:25–39. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.006

Figure 5. Accuracy by Type of ToM and Task Demand (ToM versus Control).

Figure 5

Within all three types of ToM, performance was significantly better on Control than on ToM conditions (p<.001 for each domain). Within Control conditions, performance was significantly better on Cognitive than either Affective (p<.001) or Conative (p=.044) ToM, and better on the Conative than the Affective domain (p<.001). Within ToM conditions, performance was similar on Cognitive and Affective domains (p=.427), but marginally better for Conative than either Cognitive (p=.071) or Affective (p=.075) ToM.