Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Burn Care Res. 2018 Apr 20;39(3):313–318. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182920d29

Table 2.

Products and solutions mentioned in this article

Product Description Presentation Main Use Advantages Disadvantages
Alloderm Human cadaveric acellular matrix Membrane Full thickness deep burn in cosmetically important areas Dermal substitute Expensive
Amnion Biological dressing Membrane Partial thickness face burn Moldable, pliable, monitoring of wound, contains growth factors Allogenic, expensive
AWBAT Off the market
Biobrane Biosynthetic collagen matrix Membrane (large sheets, hands) Superficial burns No dressing change if adherent for 2 weeks; reduced pain; monitoring of wound; If not adherent risk of infection
Cultured Epithelial Autograft (CEA) Keratinocytes Thin sheet of skin Large burns Large coverage with small donor Fragile, expensive, long-time to grow in-vitro
Integra Bovin collagen matrix with silicon layer on the surface Membrane with silicon layer Deep full thickness burn, burn in cosmetically important areas, large burns Good cosmetic outcome, dermal substitute Infection risk, expensive