Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2013 May 29;33(22):9364–9384. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4660-12.2013

Table 1.

Differences in protein expression levels in synaptosome fractions between HA-NL1FL and HA-NL1ΔC mice

Protein % Δ SEM p value Effect
Size
Cohen’s
d
NL1 183.00 1.23 **0.0004 0.96 7.93
NL3 155.68 56.80 0.2372 0.75 2.29
NR1 118.26 5.00 0.0610 0.76 2.33
NR2A 126.48 3.73 * 0.0161 0.89 3.80
NR2B 109.27 10.36 0.7633 0.48 1.08
GluR1 111.98 4.55 0.0518 0.80 2.71
GluR2 120.86 5.74 0.1127 0.86 3.31
PSD95 103.96 2.83 0.4515 0.57 1.37
PanShank 141.98 12.23 0.1035 0.85 3.29
Gephyrin 108.17 7.12 0.2058 0.51 1.19
PICK1 111.49 4.04 * 0.0370 0.88 3.81
SAP97 125.33 8.71 * 0.0322 0.85 3.17
SAP102 102.26 3.35 0.4964 0.19 0.39
SNAP25 107.86 2.69 0.4745 0.53 1.24
Synapsin1 119.35 2.67 * 0.0185 0.97 7.56
VGLUT1 101.17 1.51 0.0799 0.39 0.85

Summary statistics for levels of all synaptic proteins analyzed from hippocampal synaptosome fractions from controls vs. HA-NL1FL mice. Significance was determined with student’s t-test

*

p < 0.05 and

**

p > 0.01, n = 4 animals in each group.