Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov 14;104(11):2147–2155. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301420

Table 2.

Estimated Odds of Having Diabetes Controlling for the Race, Concentrated Poverty and Racial Composition of Neighborhood and Race-Racial Composition of Neighborhood.

Base Model Race-Place Model
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Black 1.63 0.94–2.83 -- --
Neighborhood concentrated poverty 1.02 0.45–1.93 1.13 0.75–1.72
Predominantly white neighborhood Ref Ref -- --
Predominantly black neighborhood 0.93 0.45–1.93 -- --
Predominantly other race neighborhood 1.16 0.63–2.14 -- --
Integrated neighborhood 1.30 0.90–1.88 -- --
White in white neighborhood -- -- Ref Ref
White in black neighborhood -- -- 1.70 0.24–11.87
White in other race neighborhood -- -- 1.32 0.34_5.11
White in integrated neighborhood -- -- 1.32 0.78–2.24
Black in black neighborhood -- -- 1.44 0.92–2.25
Black in white neighborhood -- -- 1.78 0.87–3.66
Black in other race neighborhood -- -- 1.30 0.31–5.55
Black in integrated neighborhood -- -- 2.13** 1.26–3.60
Household poverty 4 or higher Ref Ref Ref Ref
Household poverty 3–3.99 FPL 1.44 0.92–2.28 1.56 0.96–2.53
Household poverty 2–2.99 FPL 1.48 0.93–2.37 1.65* 1.01–2.68
Household poverty 1–1.99 FPL 1.93** 1.21–3.07 2.19** 1.33–3.61
Household poverty below FPL 1.93* 1.09–3.45 2.35** 1.26–4.40
Male 2.02*** 1.59–2.56 2.17*** 1.64–2.86
Family History of Diabetes 3.27*** 2.54–4.21 2.94*** 2.22–3.88
Less than 9th grade 1.19 0.79–1.79 1.01 0.60–1.70
9–12th grade, no diploma 1.08 0.71–1.64 1.00 0.63–1.58
High school graduate Ref Ref Ref Ref
Some college 1.12 0.79–1.57 1.07 0.75–1.54
College graduate or higher 0.64 0.36–1.13 0.61 0.33–1.14
Private Insurance Ref Ref Ref Ref
Medicare 1.26 0.92–1.72 1.29 0.90–1.84
Medicaid, SCHIP, other gov't. insurance 1.05 0.63–1.77 0.90 0.51–1.58
No insurance 0.77 0.51–1.16 0.65 0.36–1.17
*

denote P<0.05,

**

denotes P<0.01 and

***

denotes P<0.001.

Also the models controlled for age and quadratic age, which were significant predictors (P<0.001).