Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar 11;22(1):27–35. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1380

Table 2.

Model fitting results for measurement invariance examined across three age groups

χ2 df #par CFI TLI RMSEA
GAD
  Configural 226.647 63 78 0.987 0.992 0.034
  Metric 222.639 66 68 0.988a 0.993 0.033
  Strong 433.841 80 46 0.972 0.987 0.045
OCD
  Configural 221.430 80 78 0.974 0.979 0.028
  Metric 210.414 80 68 0.976a 0.981 0.027
  Strong 395.729 96 46 0.944 0.963 0.037
PD
  Configural 424.750 149 120 0.958 0.981 0.029
  Metric 366.538 139 104 0.965a 0.983 0.027
  Strong 506.312 156 70 0.947 0.976 0.032
SA
  Configural 292.202 107 90 0.963 0.974 0.028
  Metric 260.875 98 76 0.967a 0.975 0.027
  Strong 511.463 112 50 0.920 0.947 0.040
SP
  Configural 627.470 155 114 0.964 0.986 0.037
  Metric 929.248 128 96 0.939 0.971 0.053
  Strong 1273.453 143 62 0.914 0.963 0.060

Note: GAD, generalized anxiety disorder; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; PD, panic disorder; SA, separation anxiety disorder; SP, social phobia; df, degrees of freedom; #par, number of parameters; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker–Lewis Index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation.

a

CFI decrease smaller than 0.005.