Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 17;27(3):529–541. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3455-06.2007

Table 3.

Dependence of the mean DVRs on the magnitude of the disparity steps before and after the ibotenic acid injections: Best-fit parameters when the data were fitted with Expression 1.

A G σ D f φ Ap-p r2
monkey Q pre 0.03 1.24 1.29 −0.017 0.022 269.0 0.27 0.97
post 0.02 0.40 1.02 0.307 0.017 270.9 0.06 0.92
monkey N pre 0.06 2.53 1.09 0.012 0.017 269.5 0.35 0.96
pos 0.04 0.14 1.26 0.042 0.138 264.4 0.16 0.95
monkey P pre 0.20 6.97 1.12 0.307 0.017 271.2 1.05 0.97
post 0.10 0.63 0.82 −0.310 0.077 258.8 0.31 0.96
monkey R pre 0.05 1.88 1.18 0.038 0.017 270.3 0.29 0.99
pos 0.00 0.68 1.17 0.001 0.023 269.5 0.14 0.92
monkey S pre 0.06 1.87 1.08 0.094 0.020 270.3 0.30 0.98
post 0.01 1.39 1.15 0.220 0.016 271.4 0.19 0.94

An iterative procedure with a least-squares criterion was used to obtain the best fits with each of the parameters resolved to the number of decimal places shown. Ap-p is the peak-to-peak amplitude of Expression 1. r2 is the Coefficient of Determination. A, D, G, σ, φ, and Ap-p are in degrees, and f is in cycles/o. Disparity tuning curves based on these best-fit parameters are shown in Fig. 7. pre: pre-injection data. post: post-injection data.