Table 1.
Summary of Findings from ERP Studies of Syntactic Processing in Adults
Syntactic process |
Violation type (example) |
Study citation | Frequency findings at critical word temporal and topographic information) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Phrase structure error | Word category violation (e.g., the boy likes the to eat toast) | Bastiaansen et al. (2010) | Gamma Beta |
Decrease 0–1000msec, right centro-temporal Decrease 0–600msec, left frontal and 1000ms, mid- and right-frontal |
Theta | No change | |||
Davidson & Indefrey (2007) | Beta Theta |
Decrease 500–900msec, right temporal No change |
||
Morphosyntactic error | Agreement violation (e.g., two boy like to eat toast; the boy like to eat toast) | Bastiaansen et al. (2002) | Theta | Increase 300–500msec, left anterior |
Davidson & Indefrey (2007) | Beta Theta |
No change No change |
||
Gender violation* (e.g., I saw a darkNEUTER cloudCOMMON on the horizon) | Bastiaansen et al. (2002) | Theta | Increase 300–800msec, right anterior | |
Sentence integration | Correct sentences | Bastiaansen et al. (2002) | Theta | Increase during sentence, 0–4000msec, bilateral centro-parietal |
Bastiaansen et al. (2010) | Beta Theta |
Increase during sentence, 200–1000msec, frontal Increase during sentence, 200–1000msec, right centro-parietal |
does not occur in English