Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep 1;6:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.08.002. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.08.002

Table 1.

Summary of Findings from ERP Studies of Syntactic Processing in Adults

Syntactic
process
Violation type
(example)
Study citation Frequency findings at critical word
temporal and topographic information)
Phrase structure error Word category violation (e.g., the boy likes the to eat toast) Bastiaansen et al. (2010) Gamma
Beta
Decrease 0–1000msec, right centro-temporal
Decrease 0–600msec, left frontal and 1000ms, mid- and right-frontal
Theta No change

Davidson & Indefrey (2007) Beta
Theta
Decrease 500–900msec, right temporal
No change

Morphosyntactic error Agreement violation (e.g., two boy like to eat toast; the boy like to eat toast) Bastiaansen et al. (2002) Theta Increase 300–500msec, left anterior

Davidson & Indefrey (2007) Beta
Theta
No change
No change

Gender violation* (e.g., I saw a darkNEUTER cloudCOMMON on the horizon) Bastiaansen et al. (2002) Theta Increase 300–800msec, right anterior

Sentence integration Correct sentences Bastiaansen et al. (2002) Theta Increase during sentence, 0–4000msec, bilateral centro-parietal
Bastiaansen et al. (2010) Beta
Theta
Increase during sentence, 200–1000msec, frontal
Increase during sentence, 200–1000msec, right centro-parietal
*

does not occur in English