Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep 12;103(11):10.2105/AJPH.2013.301303. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301303

TABLE 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Tobacco Control Intervention and Control Participants: Bihar School Teachers Study, Bihar, India, 2009–2011

Characteristic Intervention Group (n = 387),
No. (%) or Mean ±SD
Control Group (n = 369),
No. (%) or Mean ±SD
P
Age, y 45.1 ±10.7 45.8 ±9.9 .6
Wave .96
  1 (2009–2010) 200 (50.2) 175 (47.4)
  2 (2010–2011) 187 (49.8) 194 (52.6)
Location .68
  Rural 138 (42.7) 177 (54.6)
  Urban 249 (57.3) 192 (45.4)
Gender .54
  Male 259 (71.5) 236 (67.4)
  Female 128 (28.5) 133 (32.6)
Occupation/position .8a
  Principal/headmaster 31 (8.0) 34 (9.2)
  Teacher 331 (85.5) 318 (86.2)
  Other (e.g., clerical, nurse) 25 (6.4) 17 (4.6)
Religion .46
  Hindu 334 (89.9) 330 (92.3)
  Other 49 (10.1) 37 (7.7)
Marital status .69
  Not married 43 (11.3) 38 (10.3)
  Married 339 (88.7) 329 (89.7)
Education .12
  ≤ college 241 (64.9) 260 (73.1)
  > college 143 (35.1) 107 (26.9)
Current use of any tobacco .38
  No 258 (66.8) 229 (62.1)
  Yes 128 (33.2) 140 (37.9)
Current smoker .48
  No 360 (93.5) 339 (92.1)
  Yes 25 (6.5) 29 (7.9)
Current use of smokeless tobacco .13
  No 263 (68.2) 232 (63.0)
  Yes 123 (31.8) 137 (37.0)

Note. Results adjusted for clustering of teachers in schools.

a

Comparison of teachers with all others.