Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct 17;103(12):e7–e14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301605

TABLE 3.

Articles in Literature Review Discussing Ethical Challenges of Community-Based Participatory Research

Ethical Challenge Citations, No.a
Insider–outsider tensions 24
    Differing assumptions, perceptions, expectations; conflicting agendas; mistrust from communities 17
    Power differentials between researchers and community; differences in cultural values; racism; seeking equality between partners; power/coercion 17
Protecting communities 22
    Challenges with consenting community; addressing collective implications of studies; determining risk–benefit ratio 18
    Confidentiality/anonymity is challenging in many closed communities and may be inappropriate; threats to privacy of health information 8
Community representation (challenges determining who is community, who speaks for community, who should sit on boards; what to do when working with multiple communities or divided communities) 15
Data sharing; reporting and using results (dealing with unflattering data or unclear results, producing tangible community benefits, defining data ownership and publication rights) 12
Working with IRBs (IRBs are unfamiliar with CBPR practices; may hold inapplicable assumptions about research methods and data ownership, be unfamiliar with dynamic nature of researcher–participant interaction, assume protocol can be stipulated in advance) 12
Managing dual roles as community members and researchers (conflicting loyalties, shifting roles of participants) 8
Practicalities (time investment, costs) 6
Challenges of community commitment (community partners may pull out, may not maintain interest and compromise study, may be hard to keep track of) 5
Cyclical, dynamic, iterative, and evolving nature of CBPR (poses problems for establishing clear ethical codes or guidelines; ethics cannot be predetermined) 5
Lack of explicit guidelines (lack of published examples on how to ensure ethical integrity in CBPR; no defined method for determining study effectiveness) 3
Ethics assumed (CBPR is seen to be ethical response; ethical issues may thus be neglected) 3
Misconduct occurs under ethical guise of CBPR (using community members to gather data only; not letting community know about outcomes) 2
Resource and funding challenges (CBPR is unrecognized by funding agencies but requires considerable resources) 2

Note. CBPR = community-based participatory research; IRB = institutional review board.

a

Two articles by Macaulay et al.,38,39 which report on similar features of the same study, are tallied as 1 article.