Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct 22;103(0 2):10.2105/AJPH.2013.301302. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301302

TABLE 4.

Effects of Substance-Use Disorders, by Poverty and Test for Differential Effects: National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, United States, 2001–2005

Effect When Not
in Poverty
Effect When
in Poverty
Differential Effecta of
AUD/DUD When in Poverty
Variable RD % (SE) P RD % (SE) P IC % (SE) P
Unadjustedb (Ref = neither disorder)
 Alcohol-use disorder only 2.9 (0.7) <.001 12.1 (3.1) <.001 9.2 (3.2) .005
 Drug-use disorder only 9.1 (3.0) .004 28.1 (8.0) <.001 19.0 (8.4) .028
 Both alcohol- and drug-use disorder 10.0 (3.2) .003 14.5 (6.4) .027 4.5 (6.6) .499
Adjustedc (Ref = neither disorder)
 Alcohol-use disorder only 0.6 (0.5) .257 3.6 (1.5) .017 3.1 (1.6) .052
 Drug-use disorder only 3.0 (1.8) .092 11.4 (5.2) .03 8.8 (5.4) .112
 Both alcohol- and drug-use disorder 2.0 (1.6) .233 2.2 (2.7) .424 0.3 (3.0) .918

Note. AUD/DUD = alcohol-use disorder/drug-use disorder; IC = interaction contrast; RD = risk difference.

a

Differential effect (i.e., IC) is the difference in RD (e.g., 9.2 = 12.1 - 2.9).

b

Unadjusted effects can be obtained by taking differences in incidence rates in Table 2.

c

Adjusted effects represent expected risk differences if each AUD/DUD by poverty strata was fixed to have all of the control variables to be equal.