Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 24;49(4):1165–1183. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12148

Table 1.

Demographic and health characteristics of study sample by whether or not the patient had a different diagnosing and treating urologist, SEER-Medicare 1995 to 2005

Unadjusted Propensity Score Weighted*

Individual Characteristics No Change Urologist Change P No Change Urologist Change P

N (%) 15,369 (100) 8,892 (100) 8,685 (100) 8,862 (100)
Race <0.001 0.741
    White 14,071 (91.6) 8,178 (94.1) 8,185 (94.2) 8,178 (94.1)
    Black 1,298 (8.4) 514 (5.9) 500 (5.8) 514 (5.9)
Age <0.001 0.766
    65 to 74 13,387 (87.1) 7,881 (90.7) 7884 (90.8) 7,881 (90.7)
    ≥75 1,982 (12.9) 811 (9.3) 801 (9.2) 811 (9.3)
Co-morbidities <0.001 0.323
    0 5,425 (35.3) 3,297 (37.9) 3296 (37.9) 3,297 (37.9)
    1 5,120 (33.3) 2,938 (33.8) 2934 (33.8) 2,938 (33.8)
    ≥2 4,824 (31.4) 2,457 (28.3) 2455 (28.3) 2,457 (28.3)
Marital Status <0.001 0.829
    Married 12,410 (80.8) 7,039 (81.0) 7028 (80.9) 7,039 (81.0)
    Not Married 2,407 (15.7) 1,277 (14.7) 1292 (14.9) 1,277 (14.7)
    Unknown 552 (3.6) 376 (4.3) 365 (4.2) 376 (4.3)
Median Income <0.001 0.884
    Lowest 3,981 (25.9) 1,941 (22.3) 1900 (21.9) 1,941 (22.3)
    Middle Low 4,023 (26.2) 2,102 (24.2) 2120 (24.2) 2,102 (24.2)
    Middle High 3,899 (25.4) 2,184 (25.1) 2160 (24.9) 2,184 (25.1)
    Highest 3,466 (22.6) 2,465 (28.4) 2505 (28.8) 2,465 (28.4)
Grade Differentiation <0.001 0.903
    Well 494 (3.2) 202 (2.3) 200 (2.3) 202 (2.3)
    Moderately 10,187 (66.3) 5,563 (64.0) 5630 (64.8) 5,563 (64.0)
    Poorly 4,550 (29.6) 2,864 (32.9) 2788 (32.1) 2,864 (32.9)
    Unknown 138 (0.9) 63 (0.7) 67 (0.8) 63 (0.7)
Tumor Stage <0.001 0.485
    1 4,832 (31.4) 2,643 (30.4) 2583 (29.7) 2,643 (30.4)
    2 9 847 (64.1) 5,546 (63.8) 5652 (65.1) 5,546 (63.8)
    3 690 (4.5) 503 (5.8) 450 (5.2) 503 (5.8)
Type of procedure <0.001 0.152
    Open prostatectomy 14,978 (97.5) 7,682 (88.4) 7919 (91.2) 7,682 (88.4)
    Minimally invasive prostatectomy 391 (2.5) 1,010 (11.6) 766 (8.8) 1,010 (11.6)
*

Bivariate statistics calculated using R survey program (Lumley, 2011) where propensity score weight is such that the treated individual receives a weight of 1 while control individuals are weighted by e/(1-e), where e is the propensity score.

Note: The propensity score model included patient age, race, comorbidities, marital status, tumor grade and stage, type of procedure, area income, diagnosing physician board certification, experience, and surgical volume, treating physician experience with laparoscopic or robotic procedures, SEER-site, and diagnosis year.