. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 9.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Sep 20;4:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.09.004

Table 3.

Predicting change in principal diagnosis CSRs after attention training using attention training group and change in attention bias scores for angry and happy faces as predictors. Coefficients (standard errors) and t-values are reported. ATG-ΔAB: Relation between attention training condition and change in attention bias score; ΔAB-ΔCSR: Relation between change in attention bias score and change in ADIS-C-IV-P CSRs; ATG-ΔCSR: effect of attention training condition on change in ADIS-C-IV-P CSRs; ATG × ΔAB-ΔCSR: interaction of attention training condition and change in attention bias scores on change in ADIS-C-IV-P CSRs.

	ATG-ΔAB		ΔAB-ΔCSR		ATG-ΔCSR		ATG × ΔAB-ΔCSR
	β (SE)	t	β (SE)	t	β (SE)	t	β (SE)	t
Angry faces	−.45 (.41)	−1.11	.41 (.20)	2.08^*	1.16 (.34)	3.44^**	−.19 (.35)	−.56
Happy faces	−.80 (.39)	−1.92⁺	−.50 (.18)	−2.74^**	1.16 (.34)	3.44^**	.93 (.34)	−1.24

p = .05.

^**

p < .05.

⁺

p = .06.