Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2014 Jan 16;271(2):534–542. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122812

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Graph comparing degree of contrast enhancement for nonculprit, probably culprit and culprit plaques. Box plots represent medians (gray lines) and interquartile ranges of degree of contrast enhancement. Nonculprit plaques had a lower degree of contrast enhancement than did probably culprit (13.6% ± 12.3 vs 25.8% ± 15.0, P = .02) and culprit (13.6% ± 12.3 vs 25.9% ± 13.4, P = .003) plaques. However, there was no difference in degree of contrast enhancement between probably culprit and culprit plaques (P = .71).