Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Feb 21;9:136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.02.003

Table 3.

Results using regions from Diekhof meta-analysis of cognitive emotion regulation in adults

Regions x y z Effect of Condition
L/R dorsomedial PFC/ACC −6 16 58 0.007
L/R dorsomedial PFC/ACC 2 32 44 0.046
L middle frontal gyrus/inferior frontal sulcus/IFJ −42 18 44 0.007
L middle frontal gyrus/inferior frontal sulcus/IFJ −42 4 48 0.01
R middle frontal gyrus/inferior frontal sulcus 40 22 44 0.26
L inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula −50 30 −10 0.0002
L inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula −54 22 −2 0.0001
L inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula −52 42 −6 0.51
R inferior frontal gyrus 50 30 −10 0.06
L intraparietal cortex −46 −66 36 0.08
L intraparietal cortex −42 −56 38 0.07
L intraparietal cortex −38 −60 30 0.08
R intraparietal cortex 50 −58 42 0.122
L inferior temporal sulcus −60 −36 −2 0.001
L anterior insula/frontal operculum −38 20 −4 0.04
R anterior insula/frontal operculum 46 14 0 0.2
L/R VMPFC 6 40 −22 0.53
L/R VMPFC 0 38 −18 0.43
L middle temporal gyrus −64 −4 −22 0.01
R frontomarginal sulcus 34 60 8 0.33
R inferior frontal gyrus 60 26 6 0.49
L ACC −8 28 28 0.03
R superior frontal gyrus 18 24 58 0.23

Note: Regions were from Table 3 of Diekhof meta-analysis. Regions in dark gray were significant at p<.05, while regions in light grey were trend level (p<.10).