Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Feb 14;34(7):1319–1325. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3400

Table 2.

Regional correlation of DWI and GBM cellular characteristics

Track Density Logistic Regression P Value False Discovery Rate P Value Relative Track Density Logistic Regression P Value False Discovery Rate P Value
Nonenhancing Tissue Specimens
 Tumor 0.20 .54 .85 0.21 .52 .52
 Hypoxia 0.14 .67 .85 0.55 .02* .05*
 Infiltration 0.06 .85 .85 0.47 .05* .07
Contrast-Enhancing Tissue Specimens
 Tumor 0.08 .72 .89 0.32 .12 .12
 Infiltration 0.35 .09 .45 0.34 .09 .11
 Hypoxia 0.03 .89 .89 0.65 .01* .05*
 Hyperplasia 0.10 .65 .89 0.45 .02* .05*
 Proliferation 0.08 .70 .89 0.39 .05* .08

Note:—Correlation analysis of tissue specimens is stratified into enhancing or nonenhancing groups (N = 36). The correlation between track density and vascular hyperplasia and cellular proliferation was not examined within nonenhancing regions, as these are not typical biological features within this region.9

*

P value <.05 is considered statistically significant.