Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Public Health. 2012 May 17;102(7):1346–1352. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300522

TABLE 2.

Parent-Reported Children’s Mean Weekly Dietary Intake by Food Security Status: Lakota People, Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota, 2005–2006

Food Item Food Security Low Food Security Very Low Food Security Pdf = 2
Fruit, times/d 0.77 0.70 0.56 .08
Vegetables, times/d 0.95 0.86 0.81 .41
French fries or fried potatoes, times/wk 1.72 1.94 1.99 .38
Pizza, times/wk 1.12b 1.32b,c 1.68c .03
Fried chicken, times/wk 0.78 1.03 1.16 .041
Sugar-sweetened beverages, times/d 1.13 1.02 1.31 .23
Sweet and salty snacks, times/d 1.36 1.51 1.49 .45
Skim or 1% milk, times/d 0.13 0.16 0.15 .63
Whole or 2% milk, times/d 0.84 0.80 0.61 .17
Chocolate milk, times/d 0.34 0.31 0.34 .80
Fast-food, times/wk 0.81 0.95 0.99 .41
Hot or ready-made foods from a convenience store or gas station, times/wk 0.64b 0.96c 1.30c .002

Note. Means and P values derived from square-root-transformed outcome variables. Means with different superscripts are statistically significantly different using Tukey-Kramer adjusted P value < .05.

a

As the adjusted Tukey-Kramer test is more conservative than the overall F test, the post hoc comparison of means resulted in no significant differences between means.