Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Sci. 2014 Apr 24;5(7):2899–2905. doi: 10.1039/c4sc00950a

Table 1.

Association constants (Ka, M–1) of 2 and 3 fit to a 1:1 binding model.

Anion 1 2 3
Cl (2.60±0.45)×102 (4.0±0.2)×101
Br (6.0±0.1)×101 (5.0±0.6)×101
I c (6.0±0.4)×101
H2PO4 (7.80±2.0)×104a (4.60±0.00 45)×104b (3.10±0.32)×103
HSO4 (3.30±0.50)×102 (1.00±0.09)×102
OAc (2.60±0.23)×103d (2.30±0.34)×103
a

Value previously reported.

b

Association constant obtained from UV/Vis titrations.

c

Evidence exists for binding, but reliable association constants could not be determined.

d

Represents an apparent association constant obtained from fitting to a 1:1 model; however, a 1:2 model gave considerably better fits, although high errors and negative Ka values prevented report of this binding data and indicates that neither model appropriately reflects the solution stoichiometry. Association constants represent an average of at least three titrations with various anions added as the tetrabutylammonium salts in 10% DMSO/CHCl3 (or the perdeutero-equivalent for NMR titrations) at 298 K, and were determined using HypNMR 2006 or Hyperquad 2006. Table 3 contains revised values for Ka's with receptor 1 based on the refitting previous data using receptors 2 and 3 as model systems.