Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jul 22;41(9):837–845. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12278

Table 3.

Hazard ratios from the multivariate analysis of the CAL + BOP model given in Fig. 1. The likelihood ratio test was used to select this model. The risk for gingivitis onset was 51% higher in males than females while each year increase in age was associated with a 3% decrease in the risk of gingivitis onset.

Hazard ratios and 95 % CI
Covariates Health → Gingivitis Health → Chronic periodontitis Gingivitis → Health Gingivitis → Chronic periodontitis
Gingival redness 2.15 (1.56, 2.98)* 0.48 (0.14, 1.70) 0.96 (0.64, 1.45) 3.11 (0.53, 18.34)
Smoking 0.72 (0.53, 1.00) 2.11 (1.19, 3.76)* 0.71 (0.48, 1.05) 1.02 (0.26, 3.97)
Gender: males 1.51 (1.10, 2.08)* 1.18 (0.67, 2.08) 1.22 (0.81, 1.84) 3.10 (0.84, 11.40)
Age 0.97 (0.96, 0.99)* 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) 0.98 (0.97, 1.00) 0.94 (0.87, 1.00)
Severity 1.00 (0.97, 1.02) 1.07 (1.02, 1.12)* 1.00 (0.97, 1.04) 1.15 (1.06, 1.26)*

We estimated the severity of the disease in a subject at baseline by counting the number of teeth with CAL > 4 mm

*

Significant results at α = 0.05