Table 4.
Individual session ratings by participant type for 2011 scientific leadership and management course.
| Session | Respondents selecting Excellent or Very Good* | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory-based | Clinical/Translational | All | |
| Day 1 | |||
| MBTI small group breakout activity | |||
| Relevance | 89% | 93% | 91% |
| Value | 86% | 90% | 88% |
| Influencing others up, down, and out; motivating others; managing conflict and leading up | |||
| Relevance | 96% | 93% | 94% |
| Value | 90% | 83% | 87% |
| Relevance—Case Study 1 Small group breakout | 72% | 71% | 72% |
| Relevance—Case Study 2 Small group breakout | 75% | 71% | 73% |
| Day 2 | |||
| Vision: Advancing your research program | |||
| Relevance | 85% | 80% | 83% |
| Value | 78% | 86% | 81% |
| Time management | |||
| Relevance | 82% | 95% | 86% |
| Value | 83% | 90% | 85% |
| Staffing your research group: recruiting the best | |||
| Relevance | 69% | 86% | 74% |
| Value | 57% | 88% | 68% |
| Case studies in small groups | |||
| Relevance | 62% | 71% | 64% |
| Value | 62% | 65% | 63% |
| Difficult conversations and negotiations | |||
| Relevance | 88% | 100% | 91% |
| Value | 85% | 100% | 90% |
| Goal setting for leadership development | |||
| Relevance | 70% | 90% | 77% |
| Value | 70% | 89% | 76% |
*
Percents are calculated based on the number of participants who answered each question rather than on the number of participants enrolled in the course, with a range of 63–110 respondents per question.