Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Dec 12;36(4):1381–1392. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22708

Table 1.

Mean BOLD change (beta) in each of the regions activated during novel picture processing regions for novel pictures or for pictures that were repeated with massed or distributed repetition, the F- statistic testing the main effect of repetition (novel, massed, distributed), and the pattern of significant differences in follow up comparisons. All of the effects of repetition in the novel picture processing regions are repetition suppression effects.

Region Mean BOLD change Repetition F(2,22)= Significant difference
Novel Dist Mass
Calcarine G. .81 .68 .62 12.8*** a b c
Lingual G. .73 .60 .55 13.1*** a b
Inferior Occipital G. .82 .71 .65 8.7** a b c
Middle Occipital G. .64 .54 .47 13.3*** a b c
Superior Occipital G. .46 .39 .35 7.0** a b
Cuneus .56 .47 .42 8.6*** a b
Fusiform G. .74 .58 .52 20.7**** a b c
Inferior Temporal G. .59 .45 .39 17.9**** a b c
Middle Temporal G. .47 .37 .33 16.5**** a b
Superior Parietal L. .50 .42 .38 ----- -----
Thalamus .24 .16 .14 9.2** a b
ParaHippocampal G. .31 .21 .14 18.6**** a b c
Hippocampus .26 .16 .12 20.0**** a b c
Amygdala .32 .19 .14 12.0*** a b
SMA .32 .28 .31 ----- -----
Precentral G. .40 .30 .29 8.7** a b
Inferior Frontal G. .41 .28 .26 23.8**** a b
****

p< .0001

***

p<.001

**

p<.01

*p<.05

a

Novel > Distributed repetition

b

Novel > Massed repetition

c

Distributed repetition > Massed Repetition