Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone Rep. 2015 Jan 1;1:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2014.10.003

Table 3.

Relative changes (%) in bone mineral density within groups and the between-group differences in the responses adjusted for baseline values and sex.

PPa IPa PI IP-PP IP-PI
Mean (SD) Mean (95% CI)
Lumbar spine 1.3 (2.8) 1.5 (2.5) 0.9 (2.2) 0.1 (−0.9, 1.2) 0.5 (−0.5, 1.5)
Total hip 0.5 (2.6) 0.0 (1.9) −0.3 (2.0) −0.5 (−1.4, 0.4) 0.3 (−0.6, 1.2)
Femoral neck 0.2 (2.9) 0.2 (2.8) −0.1 (2.1) 0.0 (−1.2, 1.1) 0.2 (−0.9, 1.3)
Trochanter 1.1 (3.1) 0.0 (2.3) −0.1 (2.7) −1.1 (−2.3, 0.0) 0.1 (−1.0, 1.2)
Sub-trochanter 0.5 (3.4) 0.0 (2.3) −0.3 (2.5) −0.6 (−1.8, 0.6) 0.2 (−0.9, 1.4)
a

3 participants had uninterpretable hip scans (1 placebo/placebo, 2 ibuprofen/placebo) and 2 participants had uninterpretable spine scans (2 ibuprofen/placebo).

PP, placebo before and placebo after exercise; IP, ibuprofen before and placebo after exercise; PI, placebo before and ibuprofen after exercise