Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 1;28(40):9997–10009. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2232-08.2008

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Comparison between response gain during tilt and translation as a function of frequency. Gain has been expressed relative to linear acceleration. Data are shown from two different experiments: those matching translation and tilt (0.16-1 Hz, cyan and magenta dashed lines, respectively) and those testing translation or tilt separately (solid blue and red lines, respectively). Black solid line illustrates the vectorial difference between translation (otolith-driven response) and tilt-translation (canal-driven response) gains (computed from the 0.16-1 Hz data only). Solid and dashed gray lines illustrate the mean gains from regular and irregular otolith afferents (replotted from Fernandez and Goldberg 1976).