Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Sep 8;15:35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.09.001

Table 6.

Bivariate correlations between startle magnitude and ERP measures from Go/No-Go and Flanker tasks.

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1. Go/No-Go ERN
2. Go/No-Go CRN 0.08
3. Go/No-Go ΔERN 0.85** −0.45**
4. Go/No-Go Pe 0.01 0.31* −0.15
5. Go/No-Go Pe correct 0.06 0.28* −0.10 0.39**
6. Go/No-Go ΔPe −0.03 0.11 −0.08 0.76** −0.31*
7. Flanker ERN 0.16 0.15 0.04 0.32 0.14 0.26
8. Flanker CRN 0.16 0.09 0.07 0.14 0.24 −0.01 0.22
9. Flanker ΔERN 0.06 0.09 0.00 0.21 −0.01 0.25 0.78** −0.44**
10. Flanker Pe −0.12 −0.17 0.01 0.28 0.18 0.19 0.25 0.46** −0.06
11. Flanker Pe correct 0.14 −0.23 0.27 −0.07 0.08 −0.13 0.12 0.16 0.01 0.04
12. Flanker ΔPe −0.19 −0.01 −0.15 0.29 0.11 0.25 0.13 0.27 −0.05 0.78** −0.60**
13. Negative Startle 0.35* 0.13 0.25 0.03 0.19 −0.10 0.42* 0.30 0.19 −0.05 0.17 −0.15

Note. Go/No-Go and Flanker n = 30; Go/No-Go and startle n = 41; Flanker and startle n = 24.

p≤0.10.

*

p≤0.05.

**

p≤0.01.